Jebel Ali

Middle East disruption continue to reshape global supply chains

Middle East linked disruption extends well beyond the region, with growing implications for global supply chains. 

As capacity tightens, routes are reconfigured and costs come under pressure, supply chains are entering a more complex and less predictable phase.

Air freight capacity tightens

Air freight markets are among the most immediately affected. Reduced capacity through key Gulf hubs — which typically handle a significant share of global cargo flows and particularly Asia — has forced airlines to reroute services and limit network coverage.

Market data indicates that capacity reductions in parts of the Middle East and South Asia have been significantly steeper than the decline in volumes, creating a sharp imbalance between supply and demand. As a result, rates on some key east–west corridors have risen by more than 50% week on week, with spot pricing increasing at an even faster pace.

Cargo is increasingly being redirected via alternative gateways such as China and Hong Kong, placing additional pressure on corridors that were previously less affected. This is tightening capacity across Asia–Europe routes and contributing to delays, space shortages and short-notice schedule changes.

At the same time, rising fuel costs and the introduction of war risk-related surcharges are adding further upward pressure, while rate validity is shortening as carriers respond to rapidly changing conditions.

Ocean disruption drives congestion, diversion and equipment imbalances

Ocean freight is facing a different but equally significant set of challenges. The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz — a corridor that typically handles a substantial share of global energy flows — has led to a dramatic reduction in vessel transits, with movements down by around 95% compared to normal levels.

Shipping lines have suspended services into the Arabian Gulf and are diverting vessels to alternative ports, where cargo is being discharged and held for onward movement. This is creating a knock-on effect across surrounding regions.

Ports outside the Gulf are now absorbing unexpected volumes. Congestion levels at key contingency hubs have reached critical levels, with some locations operating at or near full capacity and vessel waiting times extending well beyond normal ranges.

At the same time, an estimated 200,000+ TEU of capacity remains effectively trapped within the Gulf, contributing to equipment shortages in Asia as empty containers are unable to return to origin markets. This imbalance is expected to place further pressure on export flows in the coming weeks.

Rising bunker costs are also beginning to influence vessel operations, with some operators reducing sailing speeds to manage fuel consumption, adding further variability to transit times.

Costs rise as surcharges and fuel pressures build

Across both air and ocean freight, cost pressure is becoming more pronounced. Emergency surcharges linked to fuel volatility, war risk and network disruption are being introduced or expanded across multiple trade lanes.

Air freight rates have already increased sharply on key routes, while ocean carriers are implementing additional charges to reflect higher operating costs and longer routing distances. In parallel, regulatory scrutiny is increasing, particularly around how surcharges are applied and communicated.

For shippers, this is creating a more complex cost environment, where pricing can change quickly and visibility is reduced.

The past few weeks have highlighted how quickly supply chain assumptions can change and how important it is to have flexible, well-informed contingency options in place.

Metro is supporting customers by identifying alternative routings, securing capacity across air and ocean networks, and maintaining close operational control as conditions evolve.

To discuss how this situation could impact your supply chain, or to review practical routing and cost options, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director at Metro, for a direct and informed response.

Emirates Dubai

Air freight faces tighter capacity, higher costs and more complex routing decisions

Air freight is coming under growing pressure as disruption in the Middle East continues to reshape capacity, routing and pricing across key global trade lanes. 

While the impact varies by origin and destination, the overall pattern is clear: space has tightened, costs have risen and shippers are being forced to make faster, more flexible decisions.

The sharpest changes are being seen on services linking Asia and Europe, as well as on traffic moving out of India and wider South Asia.

Rates from Hong Kong to Europe have risen by almost 30% since the outbreak of the conflict, while pricing from India has moved much more aggressively, with increases of around 60% to the US and approximately 80% to Europe. More broadly, rates from several 

Asian origins into Europe have risen at double-digit weekly levels as cargo that would previously have moved through Gulf hubs is redirected elsewhere.

This reflects a market where disruption is not affecting all lanes equally. Some routes have seen relatively limited change, while others have tightened quickly as shippers compete for a smaller pool of available uplift.

Capacity loss through Gulf hubs is changing the shape of the market

A large share of Asia–Europe air cargo normally moves via the Middle East, so reduced operations at major Gulf hubs are having a wider effect on the global network.

Capacity to and from the most affected Middle Eastern airports has fallen sharply from normal levels, and overall global air cargo capacity remains below pre-conflict norms. 

Some of the hardest-hit corridors have seen available space fall by around 40%, particularly on lanes linking Asia Pacific with the Middle East and the Middle East with Europe.

As a result, cargo is being pushed towards direct services or rerouted through Asian hubs such as Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea and Japan. That is helping to restore some connectivity, but it is also creating fresh pressure on feeder legs, intra-Asia services and selected transpacific flows.

In response, carriers have started adding capacity on some Asia Pacific–Europe routes, with space up by roughly 20% on certain corridors. Even so, the market remains tight, and additional capacity has not been enough to remove the pressure entirely.

Fuel surcharges are adding a second layer of cost pressure

Freight rates are only part of the story. Fuel surcharges are also rising rapidly as airlines deal with higher jet fuel costs and longer routings around restricted airspace.

Jet fuel prices have risen sharply, and in some cases the gap between crude oil and jet fuel has widened significantly, increasing the likelihood of further surcharge adjustments. 

Some airlines are now reviewing fuel surcharges weekly rather than monthly, which makes budgeting more difficult, as cost is changing more quickly and with less notice.

This is creating a double cost challenge: higher base freight rates combined with higher fuel-related charges.

The market is reacting with alternative routings

As direct capacity becomes harder to secure, the market is adapting.

Some cargo is being routed on longer, less conventional paths, including via North America, simply because direct Asia–Europe space is too limited or too expensive. These solutions can keep freight moving, but they usually come at a premium and add complexity to planning.

At the same time, demand is increasing for multimodal alternatives. Road connections between airports, regional trucking solutions and other hybrid models are becoming more attractive where they can protect delivery schedules or reduce the cost of a fully airfreight solution.

This is a reminder that the current challenge is not just about price. It is also about network design, transit reliability and how quickly supply chains can adapt when traditional routings become less dependable.

A volatile market is masking very different lane-by-lane realities

Headline air freight indices suggest the global market has moved only modestly overall, with broad average rates rising by only small percentages week on week and remaining close to last year’s levels.

However, those averages disguise major differences between individual trade lanes. Some corridors have posted only limited movement, while others have risen sharply in a matter of days. Outbound Asia has shown particularly wide divergence, with strong gains into Europe from several origins, while some US-bound lanes have softened or remained 

mixed.

For shippers, that means average market data only tells part of the story. The real challenge is understanding where pressure is building, where capacity is returning, and which routing options remain commercially viable.

Air freight decisions are becoming more time-sensitive, more expensive and more dependent on having the right alternatives ready.

Metro helps customers navigate tight capacity, fuel-driven cost changes and shifting routings by building practical options around urgency, cargo profile and destination requirements.

If you need to assess the most reliable or cost-effective way to move time-critical freight, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director at Metro. He can help you explore direct air, alternative gateway and routing options in line with current market conditions.

Truck Middle East

Road and road–air solutions gain traction in Middle East disruption

As disruption across the Middle East continues to restrict traditional air and ocean routes, shippers are increasingly turning to road and road–air solutions to maintain cargo flow. 

What began as a contingency response is now becoming a core part of how supply chains are adapting to a more constrained and fragmented logistics environment.

With vessel access to the Arabian Gulf severely restricted and air capacity reduced, significant volumes of cargo are being redirected onto land-based networks.

Ports such as Khor Fakkan, Fujairah, Sohar and Jeddah are now acting as key entry points, with cargo transferred onto trucks for onward delivery across the Gulf. These corridors are supporting flows into major markets including the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain.

However, this shift is placing pressure on overland infrastructure that was not designed to handle such volumes. Trucking demand has risen sharply, leading to capacity shortages on key corridors across Oman, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. As a result, transit times are becoming less predictable and costs are rising in response to increased demand.

At the same time, congestion at contingency ports is extending dwell times, further increasing reliance on inland transport to maintain movement.

Road–air models offer a practical alternative to constrained air freight

As direct air freight capacity remains limited and increasingly expensive, road–air solutions are becoming more widely used.

Cargo is being moved by road to alternative airport gateways outside the most affected areas, where it can reconnect with more stable flight schedules. This approach helps bypass disrupted hubs while maintaining faster transit times than traditional ocean freight.

The model is also being applied on longer-distance routes. In some cases, cargo is being trucked across regions before connecting with onward air services, reflecting a broader shift towards more flexible, hybrid transport solutions.

Demand for these services is increasing as shippers look to balance speed, cost and reliability in a market where traditional options are under pressure.

Operational complexity increases as networks evolve

While these solutions are keeping cargo moving, they also introduce new layers of complexity.

Border crossings, customs processes and security checks are becoming more critical to overall transit time performance. In addition, the rapid scaling of road-based solutions is creating pressure on available capacity, particularly on heavily used corridors.

At the same time, multimodal coordination is becoming more important. Successfully combining road, air and ocean services requires close planning, real-time visibility and the ability to adapt quickly as conditions change.

This is driving greater demand for integrated logistics approaches that can manage multiple transport modes within a single, coordinated solution.

Rather than relying on fixed routes or single modes, businesses are adopting more flexible strategies that allow them to respond to disruption as it develops. This includes using alternative gateways, combining transport modes and building contingency options into their planning.

When traditional routes are under pressure, the ability to switch quickly to practical alternatives becomes critical.

Metro is actively supporting customers with road–air and direct road solutions, combining regional trucking, alternative airport gateways and multimodal coordination to keep cargo moving.

If you are facing delays, capacity constraints or rising air freight costs, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director at Metro, to discuss how road–air or direct road options could support your shipments in the current market.

Salalah

Drones strike Gulf hubs as air and sea freight networks tighten

Security incidents on 11 March have added further pressure to global freight networks already affected by disruption across the Middle East.

A drone strike at the Port of Salalah in Oman hit fuel storage tanks, forcing the suspension of port operations and bunkering activity at one of the region’s key container transhipment and fuel supply hubs. Salalah is a critical location for vessel refuelling and cargo transfers in the Arabian Sea, and any interruption to bunkering services can affect shipping schedules and vessel routing across multiple trade lanes.

Initial assessments indicate both port operations and bunker supply remain suspended while the extent of the damage is evaluated. The incident follows earlier security events near the port and additional reported attacks affecting nearby Duqm, increasing concern over the resilience of key logistics infrastructure in the region.

At the same time, Dubai International Airport temporarily halted operations after a drone strike nearby wounded four people on the morning of 11 March. Flights have since resumed, but the incident briefly disrupted one of the world’s busiest international aviation hubs and a critical gateway for global air cargo flows.

Port congestion risk rising

The operational disruption comes at a time when global container shipping networks remain highly sensitive to sudden shocks.

When vessels are diverted or delayed, shipping networks can rapidly move from normal operations to congestion. Cargo diverted from disrupted Gulf ports is already being redirected to other locations, with India’s west coast ports among the first to experience increased volumes.

Shipping networks remain vulnerable because delays compound quickly across vessel rotations.  In 2025, Red Sea re-routings took about 9% of capacity out of the system, while port congestion took out a further 10%. That’s capacity lost, not because the ships didn’t exist, but because delays made them non-functional.

The current situation’s risk comes in two parts. First, as carriers abandon Suez transits because of the new strikes, schedules shift unevenly back toward the Cape of Good Hope. And as carriers move at different cadences, it creates vessel bunching, port congestion and massive service instability.

Secondly, the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has trapped vessels and forced carriers to suspend transits, creating a sudden loss of capacity that is rippling through the whole supply chain.

Air cargo capacity tightening across global routes

Air freight markets are also tightening as disruption across Middle Eastern aviation hubs affects global cargo connectivity.

Many international air cargo supply chains rely on Gulf carriers and airports as transit points between Asia, Europe and North America. When these hubs face operational disruption or flight cancellations, cargo must be rerouted through alternative airports and airlines.

The impact is already visible in export markets heavily dependent on these connections. In Bangladesh, where around 60% of air cargo typically moves through Middle Eastern hubs, hundreds of flights have been cancelled since late February.

As a result, air freight rates to Europe have more than tripled, while rates to the United States have almost doubled, reflecting the sudden shortage of available capacity.

What this means for shippers

The attacks on Salalah and the temporary disruption at Dubai International Airport highlight how quickly events in the region can affect global logistics infrastructure.

For shippers, the immediate risks include reduced air cargo capacity, potential vessel delays linked to bunkering disruption, and increased pressure on alternative ports and airports as cargo flows are redirected.

Metro is monitoring developments across Middle Eastern ports, airports and carrier networks and will continue to provide updates as the situation evolves.

If your shipments move through affected trade lanes, contact your Metro account manager to review routing options and ensure your supply chain remains resilient as conditions develop.