Forklift loading container

Asia–UK ocean market faces volatile October as capacity shifts

UK importers face an unusually volatile October as falling Asia–Europe freight rates collide with excess scheduled capacity, returning Suez services, short-notice blank sailings and continuing disruption across Asian ports.

Ocean carriers are attempting to halt a 12-week decline in Asia–Europe rates with increases planned for the second half of October. However, the traditional slowdown following China's Golden Week (1–7 October) could make those increases difficult to sustain unless carriers withdraw significant capacity.

For shippers, lower underlying demand may therefore bring temporarily cheaper freight but not necessarily more reliable supply chains.

Golden Week creates a capacity imbalance

Asia–North Europe scheduled capacity is unusually high. Around 1.5m TEU is scheduled across the four-week Golden Week period, 27% more than last year and 60% above pre-pandemic averages.

But those figures overstate the amount of genuinely new capacity entering the market.

Typhoon disruption and severe congestion at Chinese ports have pushed vessels significantly behind schedule. As delayed ships return to service alongside their normally scheduled counterparts, 12 double sailings are expected across Asia–Europe and Mediterranean services during the first two weeks of October.

At the same time, Golden Week factory closures will reduce export volumes.

The result could be a rapid shift from constrained effective capacity to temporary oversupply as delayed vessels return and cargo volumes fall.

Carriers are likely to respond with significant blank sailings, potentially announced at relatively short notice. That could leave mid-to-late October schedules particularly vulnerable to cancellations, rolled cargo and departure changes.

Suez return adds more effective capacity

The gradual return of Asia–Europe services to the Suez Canal adds another variable.

Faster Suez routings effectively release vessel capacity because ships can complete round voyages considerably faster than when sailing around the Cape of Good Hope.

Asia–North Europe services remain cautious, but the shift is gathering pace. Around 30% of backhaul capacity was using Suez during September, with this expected to reach approximately 40% in October.

Several additional services are now moving back to the canal, primarily to return delayed vessels to Asia more quickly following severe port congestion.

For UK importers, increased Suez utilisation could eventually support shorter transit times and greater capacity. In the immediate term, however, changing vessel rotations and the possibility of further network adjustments add even more uncertainty to schedules.

Security conditions in the Red Sea also remain fluid, meaning carriers retain the option of reverting to Cape routings if their risk assessments change.

Reliability remains the bigger concern

Freight rates from Asia to North Europe have been under pressure for some time, which is why carriers have announced increases for the second half of October in an attempt to reverse that trend.

But price is only part of the equation. Multiple typhoons in seven weeks created severe disruption at Shanghai, Ningbo-Zhoushan and Yantian, with berthing delays extending up to 14 days, with on-time performance on services falling to just 62% in August, while average delays for late Asia–Europe vessels reached five days.

Residual disruption is expected to continue through October as vessel bunching, accumulated container backlogs and post-Golden Week capacity adjustments work through the network.

The immediate risk for UK importers is therefore less about a shortage of nominal vessel capacity and more about whether booked capacity operates when expected.

European disruption adds another risk

Conditions at destination also require attention. German port workers are currently voting on authorisation for indefinite strike action after rejecting the latest employer wage offer. The ballot closes on 1 October, with Hamburg, Bremen, Bremerhaven and other major German ports potentially affected if industrial action follows.

German freight interests are already preparing for possible restrictions affecting terminal handling and pre- and on-carriage.

While this does not directly affect UK ports, significant disruption at major North European gateways could create wider network effects as carriers adjust rotations and cargo moves through alternative ports.

The transatlantic market is moving differently. Europe–US East Coast spot rates remain substantially above last year's levels, while carriers are managing winter capacity through blank sailings. This makes early allocation planning particularly important for exporters relying on North Atlantic services.

Flexibility will matter through Q4

October therefore presents an unusual combination for Asia–UK shippers.

Underlying rates are soft, substantial scheduled capacity is entering the market and shorter Suez routings are gradually restoring effective vessel supply. Yet congestion, poor schedule reliability and likely carrier capacity management mean the operational environment could remain unpredictable, with rates likely to harden.

Shippers should consequently avoid interpreting softer rates as a signal that the market has normalised.

Metro's established carrier relationships and extensive global network give our teams access to multiple services, routings and consolidation options across the Asia–UK trade. By monitoring capacity, schedules and gateway conditions, we can identify alternatives when blank sailings, congestion or network changes threaten planned movements.

Talk to Metro about your Q4 Asia–UK requirements and how alternative carriers, routings and consolidation options can provide greater flexibility as the market adjusts.

double stack container train

India export surge puts pressure on inland networks

India’s export surge is tightening ocean capacity, creating equipment shortages and increasing pressure on the inland road and rail networks that support its container gateways.

Premier carrier sailings from West India, including Nhava Sheva and Mundra, remained largely sold out through September on key trades, with market conditions expected to stay firm as exporters compete for available capacity.

The pressure is particularly evident at JNPA, where exporters are reporting growing difficulties securing empty containers. Forty-foot equipment is proving especially scarce, while shortages have also been reported at inland container depots (ICDs) across northern India.

The result is a supply chain challenge extending well beyond ocean freight availability.

Record exports tighten the equipment cycle

JNPA handled a record 832,000 TEU in August, rising approximately 12% month on month and 20% year on year.

More unusually, export containers exceeded imports during the month. India traditionally operates as a container-deficit market and relies heavily on repositioned equipment and boxes arriving from the Far East to replenish stocks.

Stronger exports are therefore consuming available equipment faster, while disrupted vessel schedules are making it harder for shipping lines to return empty containers to the locations where exporters need them.

Freight stations around JNPA have reported vehicles waiting in long queues at container yards without being able to collect equipment. Similar problems are emerging inland, with difficulties securing empty boxes reported at several northern Indian ICDs.

With Indian exporters traditionally increasing shipments during the January-March final fiscal quarter to meet annual targets, equipment positioning and advance planning could become increasingly important over the coming months.

Port performance shifts attention inland

The pressure also highlights a broader issue facing India's rapidly expanding container trade, because moving a box through a port efficiently is only one part of the journey.

Around 20,000 TEU leave JNPA by road each day, compared with approximately 2,000 TEU by rail. As port throughput increases, that imbalance places additional pressure on highways, container freight stations and other supporting infrastructure around the Mumbai region.

Earlier disruption caused by trailer-driver shortages demonstrated how quickly the land-side network can become constrained, slowing container movements between terminals and CFS facilities even when quayside operations continue normally.

Mundra has faced its own challenges. Container train operators reported significant congestion earlier this year, including more than 16,000 TEU awaiting movement and a rail pipeline exceeding 60 trains at one stage.

More recent disruption affecting empty-container yards has reinforced the importance of looking at the complete land-side operation when planning Indian shipments.

Rail investment and demand is growing

The completion of the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) connection to JNPA in September represents an important development.

The 1,506km corridor connects the Mumbai gateway with northern India's major industrial and logistics regions, allowing freight trains to bypass much of the conventional passenger railway network.

Together with the Eastern DFC, India now has almost 2,850km of dedicated freight railway. However, demand is building rapidly.

The two corridors averaged around 438 trains a day in August against nominal capacity of 480, representing approximately 91% utilisation. The Western corridor was operating at around 88%, while the Eastern corridor was approaching 95%.

Double-stack and longer trains provide additional throughput potential, but the figures illustrate how quickly India's expanding trade is absorbing new infrastructure.

Meanwhile, other gateways are working to increase rail's share of inland movements. Chennai has restored its container rail connection with ICD Sanathnagar in Hyderabad and is exploring further inland services, potentially providing shippers with additional gateway and routing choices.

India movements require end-to-end planning

India's expanding ports and dedicated freight corridors are transforming the country's logistics infrastructure, but the current export surge demonstrates that capacity cannot be considered in isolation.

Sold-out sailings, shortages of export equipment, pressure at container yards, busy inland terminals and congested road connections can all influence whether cargo reaches its vessel as planned.

For importers and exporters, that increases the value of booking early, maintaining visibility of equipment and inland conditions and considering alternative gateways, routings and consolidation options where appropriate.

Metro India: local reach, global options

Metro's extensive footprint across India connects customers with the country's principal ports, ICDs, manufacturing regions and logistics centres, supported by established global carrier relationships and an international freight network.

Our local teams combine ocean and air freight, consolidation and inland transport capabilities to manage the complete movement. When capacity, equipment availability or congestion affects established supply chains, we can assess alternative carriers, gateways, routings, modes and consolidation options to help keep cargo moving.

If you have shipments moving to, from or across India, talk to Metro about current conditions and the options for protecting your upcoming movements.

US trucks at port

Transpacific pressure shifts from ocean rates to inland costs

Transpacific shippers are entering October with ocean freight rates close to pandemic-era highs, continuing schedule disruption and a new cost pressure emerging after US diesel prices climbed sharply.

The market may finally be approaching a turning point after five months of rising transpacific rates, as China's Golden Week brings the traditional peak shipping period towards a close.

However, any correction is unlikely to remove the challenges facing shippers immediately. Carriers continue to actively manage capacity, schedule reliability remains under pressure and rapidly rising US diesel costs are feeding directly into inland transport surcharges.

Ocean rates approach historic highs

The scale of the transpacific increase has been exceptional. By 17 September, average Far East–US West Coast spot rates had risen 324% since late February, while East Coast rates were 325% higher. That left rates just 18% and 11% respectively below their pandemic-era records.

The East Coast has experienced particularly strong pressure, while carriers have responded by adding capacity. Offered Far East–US East Coast capacity increased by around 6–7% between August and September as shipping lines sought to take advantage of elevated demand and pricing.

That additional capacity could help moderate the market as the pre-Golden Week cargo rush ends.

There are already tentative signs of a change. The Shanghai Containerised Freight Index recorded a 1% decline on both US coast trades in its latest reading, potentially ending a five-month upward run.

Whether that develops into a sustained correction will depend partly on how carriers manage capacity as seasonal demand falls.

Blank sailings keep capacity tight

Shipping lines still have considerable scope to adjust available space. Across the major East–West trades, 58 of 712 scheduled sailings are expected to be cancelled between weeks 40 and 44, an 8% cancellation rate. Almost two-thirds of those blank sailings are concentrated on the eastbound transpacific.

Capacity is therefore only part of the challenge. Vessel utilisation on the eastbound transpacific has been running approximately 8% above pre-pandemic levels, while congestion and blank sailings have contributed to deteriorating schedule reliability.

Shippers can consequently secure space but still encounter rollovers or delayed departures. Where a booking rollover combines with a late vessel, delays can approach two weeks.

While congestion at Chinese ports has started to improve from its early September peak, some of that pressure has shifted into Southeast Asia, adding another source of potential disruption to vessel rotations.

Attention turns to US inland costs

At destination, another significant cost pressure is emerging. US diesel prices reached a national average of $6.53 per gallon on 21 September, rising more than 24 cents in a week and $2.78 compared with the same period last year.

The immediate effect is being felt through fuel surcharges rather than a sudden increase in underlying freight demand.

Industry estimates suggest higher fuel costs have increased truckload costs by approximately 25–30% since the beginning of the year, with total less-than-truckload shipment costs around 20% higher.

Regional differences also matter. West Coast diesel averaged $7.46 per gallon compared with $6.27 on the East Coast, creating potentially significant differences in the fuel component of inland transportation costs.

Spot trucking may take longer to adjust. Historically, spot rates require three to four weeks to catch up with rapid diesel increases, putting additional pressure on smaller carriers that cannot immediately recover higher fuel expenditure.

If that forces capacity from the market, shippers could face higher trucking costs even without a major increase in freight volumes.

A changing transpacific market

October could therefore mark a change in the transpacific market rather than an immediate return to normal conditions.

The end of the traditional peak and additional vessel capacity provide some scope for ocean freight rates to soften. But blank sailings give carriers the ability to respond to falling demand, while unreliable schedules continue to complicate shipment planning.

At the same time, the cost challenge is increasingly extending beyond the port.

For shippers, monitoring the complete Asia–US movement, including available sailings, schedule reliability, port choice, inland routing and fuel surcharges, will remain important as the market moves beyond peak season.

Metro's global carrier relationships, US office footprint and extensive US logistics capabilities give our teams visibility across the complete transpacific movement. 

From origin through to destination and inland delivery we can assess alternative carriers, services, gateways and routings while coordinating US transport requirements, to help customers respond to changing capacity, schedules and costs.

Talk to Metro about your upcoming transpacific movements and the options available to protect capacity, transit time and total landed cost.

HKG port

Asian port congestion could disrupt supply chains well into 2027

Severe congestion across Asian container ports is tying up millions of TEU of capacity, driving schedule reliability to a four-year low and raising the prospect of disruption continuing well into 2027.

Repeated typhoons, strong Asian export demand and congestion spreading between ports have created disruption comparable in scale with the peak of the pandemic.

While conditions should improve as weather disruption eases, analysis of previous congestion cycles suggests clearing the accumulated vessel and container backlogs could take considerably longer.

Sea-Intelligence estimates it could take up to ten months for congestion to return to the levels recorded in June 2025, potentially leaving supply chains dealing with the consequences through the first half of next year.

Reliability falls as capacity gets trapped

The immediate impact is already visible in global shipping schedules. Schedule reliability fell another 5.9 percentage points in Sea-Intelligence's September report to 49.9%, its lowest level since September 2022 and the second consecutive significant monthly decline.

Late vessels are also getting later. Average delays increased by 0.6 days to 6.81 days, the highest since March 2022 and almost two days longer than a year earlier.

Estimates of the amount of capacity affected vary according to methodology and timing, but indicate the scale of the problem. Around 3.9m TEU is currently caught up in global port congestion, returning congestion volumes to levels last experienced in 2022.

Sea-Intelligence calculates the disruption is absorbing around 8.5% of the global containership fleet, effectively removing millions of TEU of usable vessel capacity from the market.

That helps explain why the industry's substantial influx of new vessels has yet to translate fully into available capacity. Ships waiting outside ports or arriving significantly behind schedule cannot provide the capacity their nominal deployment suggests.

Disruption spreads across Asian networks

Weather has been an important catalyst. Repeated typhoons have reduced effective port capacity at major Chinese gateways at the same time as strong export demand has increased pressure on terminals.

But congestion rarely remains confined to the port where the original disruption occurs.

Late vessels arrive together at subsequent calls, creating bunching and additional terminal pressure. Carriers may respond by omitting badly affected ports, but that can simply transfer containers and vessel calls to alternative gateways and transhipment hubs.

Some of that pressure is already shifting towards Southeast Asia and the Indian subcontinent.

The distortion can also make scheduled capacity figures misleading. Asia–North Europe deployment around Golden Week reached around 1.5m TEU over four weeks, approximately 27% higher year on year and 60% above pre-pandemic averages.

Rather than representing a straightforward increase in available space, part of that apparent capacity reflects vessels bunching as disrupted schedules overlap.

Rates reflect shrinking effective capacity

The consequences are particularly visible within Asia. Drewry's Intra-Asia Container Index has reached record territory as Golden Week demand meets restricted effective capacity. Shanghai–Laem Chabang increased 22% in its latest assessment, while Shanghai–Jakarta rose 12%.

The impact extends further afield. Asia–US rates remain close to pandemic-era records, while charter markets are also signalling exceptionally tight vessel availability.

This creates an important distinction for shippers: deployed capacity and usable capacity are not the same thing.

Even as carriers receive new vessels, congestion can absorb that additional capacity before customers see the benefit through improved availability, reliability or pricing.

The landside challenge could last longer

Port congestion also has consequences beyond vessel schedules. For individual shippers, reliability ultimately depends on when cargo actually becomes available and reaches its destination. Vessel bunching can create sudden surges in container volumes through terminals, rail connections, depots and road networks.

Those supporting networks cannot expand as quickly as vessel capacity.

Terminal, rail and road infrastructure requires long-term investment, while operators also need to maintain high asset utilisation. That leaves less spare capacity available to absorb sudden spikes following weather disruption or vessel bunching.

The result can be a second wave of delay after a vessel reaches port, particularly where terminals and inland networks are already operating close to capacity.

Chinese New Year becomes the next pressure point

The length of the potential recovery is therefore significant.

Based on recovery patterns following the pandemic and the initial Red Sea disruption, Sea-Intelligence estimates congestion could take six to eight months simply to return to conditions seen at the end of 2025, and 10 months to return to the much lower levels recorded in June 2025.

That timeline extends beyond Golden Week and potentially into the next major Asian shipping peak.

Chinese New Year falls on 6 February 2027, meaning the traditional pre-holiday cargo rush could arrive before networks have fully cleared today's disruption.

For shippers planning Q4 movements and early 2027 supply chains, advance bookings, realistic transit assumptions and flexibility around routing and gateways could therefore remain important well beyond the current congestion peak.

Keeping cargo moving when networks tighten

Metro combines established global carrier relationships with extensive origin, destination and inland capabilities, giving our teams the flexibility to respond when congestion disrupts established shipping patterns.

Through consolidation services, alternative carrier and routing options, gateway selection and coordinated inland transport, we can assess the complete movement rather than relying on a single service or routing.

With Asian congestion potentially affecting capacity and schedules well into 2027, talk to Metro about upcoming movements and the options available to protect space, maintain visibility and build greater flexibility into your supply chain.