Jebel Ali

Middle East disruption continue to reshape global supply chains

Middle East linked disruption extends well beyond the region, with growing implications for global supply chains. 

As capacity tightens, routes are reconfigured and costs come under pressure, supply chains are entering a more complex and less predictable phase.

Air freight capacity tightens

Air freight markets are among the most immediately affected. Reduced capacity through key Gulf hubs — which typically handle a significant share of global cargo flows and particularly Asia — has forced airlines to reroute services and limit network coverage.

Market data indicates that capacity reductions in parts of the Middle East and South Asia have been significantly steeper than the decline in volumes, creating a sharp imbalance between supply and demand. As a result, rates on some key east–west corridors have risen by more than 50% week on week, with spot pricing increasing at an even faster pace.

Cargo is increasingly being redirected via alternative gateways such as China and Hong Kong, placing additional pressure on corridors that were previously less affected. This is tightening capacity across Asia–Europe routes and contributing to delays, space shortages and short-notice schedule changes.

At the same time, rising fuel costs and the introduction of war risk-related surcharges are adding further upward pressure, while rate validity is shortening as carriers respond to rapidly changing conditions.

Ocean disruption drives congestion, diversion and equipment imbalances

Ocean freight is facing a different but equally significant set of challenges. The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz — a corridor that typically handles a substantial share of global energy flows — has led to a dramatic reduction in vessel transits, with movements down by around 95% compared to normal levels.

Shipping lines have suspended services into the Arabian Gulf and are diverting vessels to alternative ports, where cargo is being discharged and held for onward movement. This is creating a knock-on effect across surrounding regions.

Ports outside the Gulf are now absorbing unexpected volumes. Congestion levels at key contingency hubs have reached critical levels, with some locations operating at or near full capacity and vessel waiting times extending well beyond normal ranges.

At the same time, an estimated 200,000+ TEU of capacity remains effectively trapped within the Gulf, contributing to equipment shortages in Asia as empty containers are unable to return to origin markets. This imbalance is expected to place further pressure on export flows in the coming weeks.

Rising bunker costs are also beginning to influence vessel operations, with some operators reducing sailing speeds to manage fuel consumption, adding further variability to transit times.

Costs rise as surcharges and fuel pressures build

Across both air and ocean freight, cost pressure is becoming more pronounced. Emergency surcharges linked to fuel volatility, war risk and network disruption are being introduced or expanded across multiple trade lanes.

Air freight rates have already increased sharply on key routes, while ocean carriers are implementing additional charges to reflect higher operating costs and longer routing distances. In parallel, regulatory scrutiny is increasing, particularly around how surcharges are applied and communicated.

For shippers, this is creating a more complex cost environment, where pricing can change quickly and visibility is reduced.

The past few weeks have highlighted how quickly supply chain assumptions can change and how important it is to have flexible, well-informed contingency options in place.

Metro is supporting customers by identifying alternative routings, securing capacity across air and ocean networks, and maintaining close operational control as conditions evolve.

To discuss how this situation could impact your supply chain, or to review practical routing and cost options, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director at Metro, for a direct and informed response.

container ships

Ocean rates move unevenly as conflict, congestion and pricing strategies reshape the market

Ocean freight spot rates are entering a more volatile phase, as Middle East disruption, port congestion and carrier pricing strategies combine to reshape conditions across the main east–west trade lanes.

Recent market data shows a widening gap between how different trades are performing. 

On Asia–Europe routes, spot rates have risen sharply in some cases, with week-on-week increases approaching 20%, while other indices suggest more modest movements of only a few percentage points.

This disparity reflects a market where pricing is no longer moving in a single direction. Instead, shippers are seeing a broad range of rates depending on timing, routing and carrier strategy, with some short-term quotes significantly above prevailing averages.

On the transpacific, the picture remains more subdued. While some indices show modest increases of around 3–5%, underlying demand remains relatively soft, which is limiting upward pressure and keeping overall rate levels more stable.

Although the main east–west trades do not directly transit the Middle East Gulf, the impact of the conflict is feeding into global ocean networks.

The continued disruption to Red Sea and Gulf routing is extending voyage distances and increasing vessel utilisation. This reduces effective capacity across the global fleet, helping to support rates despite relatively cautious demand.

Congestion builds across alternative hubs

As vessels divert away from affected areas, pressure is building at alternative ports across Asia and the wider region.

Transhipment hubs are absorbing higher-than-normal volumes, often arriving on disrupted schedules. This is leading to congestion, longer waiting times and reduced operational efficiency.

The knock-on effect is being felt across supply chains, with delays extending beyond the immediate region and into connecting services on Asia–Europe and intra-Asia routes.

This congestion is also contributing to rate increases, particularly on trades closest to the disruption, where spot pricing has risen by double-digit percentages since the situation escalated.

Carriers adopt firmer pricing strategies

Alongside operational disruption, carrier behaviour is playing a growing role in shaping the market.

Pricing strategies have become more assertive, with carriers introducing higher FAK levels, applying emergency surcharges and taking a firmer approach to contract negotiations. In some cases, new rate levels have been set significantly above recent spot benchmarks, even as softening continues to appear in parts of the market.

Fuel-related and war risk surcharges are also being layered onto base rates, reflecting higher operating costs and increased insurance premiums. This is creating a more complex pricing structure, where total landed costs are less predictable and subject to change at short notice.

Regulatory attention is also increasing, with the FMC in the United States and authorities in China and India signalling the need for greater transparency around pricing and surcharge application.

Short-term support, longer-term uncertainty

In the near term, these combined factors are helping to support ocean freight rates and prevent the sharp declines that might otherwise follow the post-Chinese New Year period.

However, the outlook remains uncertain. Much will depend on how demand develops in the coming weeks and how carriers manage capacity through blank sailings and network adjustments.

If disruption persists, longer sailing distances and ongoing congestion are likely to continue absorbing capacity. At the same time, any sustained weakness in demand could limit how far rates can rise.

For shippers, this creates a market that is not only volatile, but also increasingly difficult to interpret without close visibility of both operational conditions and carrier behaviour.

With rates moving in different directions and pricing structures becoming more complex, clarity is becoming just as important as cost.

Metro works closely with customers to break down market movements, challenge assumptions and identify the most effective routing and pricing strategies across global ocean networks.

If you would like a clearer view of where rates are heading and how to position your supply chain - EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director at Metro, for a detailed, shipment-specific discussion.

Truck Middle East

Road and road–air solutions gain traction in Middle East disruption

As disruption across the Middle East continues to restrict traditional air and ocean routes, shippers are increasingly turning to road and road–air solutions to maintain cargo flow. 

What began as a contingency response is now becoming a core part of how supply chains are adapting to a more constrained and fragmented logistics environment.

With vessel access to the Arabian Gulf severely restricted and air capacity reduced, significant volumes of cargo are being redirected onto land-based networks.

Ports such as Khor Fakkan, Fujairah, Sohar and Jeddah are now acting as key entry points, with cargo transferred onto trucks for onward delivery across the Gulf. These corridors are supporting flows into major markets including the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain.

However, this shift is placing pressure on overland infrastructure that was not designed to handle such volumes. Trucking demand has risen sharply, leading to capacity shortages on key corridors across Oman, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. As a result, transit times are becoming less predictable and costs are rising in response to increased demand.

At the same time, congestion at contingency ports is extending dwell times, further increasing reliance on inland transport to maintain movement.

Road–air models offer a practical alternative to constrained air freight

As direct air freight capacity remains limited and increasingly expensive, road–air solutions are becoming more widely used.

Cargo is being moved by road to alternative airport gateways outside the most affected areas, where it can reconnect with more stable flight schedules. This approach helps bypass disrupted hubs while maintaining faster transit times than traditional ocean freight.

The model is also being applied on longer-distance routes. In some cases, cargo is being trucked across regions before connecting with onward air services, reflecting a broader shift towards more flexible, hybrid transport solutions.

Demand for these services is increasing as shippers look to balance speed, cost and reliability in a market where traditional options are under pressure.

Operational complexity increases as networks evolve

While these solutions are keeping cargo moving, they also introduce new layers of complexity.

Border crossings, customs processes and security checks are becoming more critical to overall transit time performance. In addition, the rapid scaling of road-based solutions is creating pressure on available capacity, particularly on heavily used corridors.

At the same time, multimodal coordination is becoming more important. Successfully combining road, air and ocean services requires close planning, real-time visibility and the ability to adapt quickly as conditions change.

This is driving greater demand for integrated logistics approaches that can manage multiple transport modes within a single, coordinated solution.

Rather than relying on fixed routes or single modes, businesses are adopting more flexible strategies that allow them to respond to disruption as it develops. This includes using alternative gateways, combining transport modes and building contingency options into their planning.

When traditional routes are under pressure, the ability to switch quickly to practical alternatives becomes critical.

Metro is actively supporting customers with road–air and direct road solutions, combining regional trucking, alternative airport gateways and multimodal coordination to keep cargo moving.

If you are facing delays, capacity constraints or rising air freight costs, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director at Metro, to discuss how road–air or direct road options could support your shipments in the current market.

rail freight

Cross-Channel rail freight set to strengthen UK–Europe intermodal links

Plans to reintroduce regular cross-Channel rail freight services are moving forward, signalling a potential shift in how goods move between the UK and mainland Europe. 

As investment in infrastructure gathers pace, rail is re-emerging as a viable complement to established road and sea routes.

A government-backed agreement to redevelop the Barking Eurohub in east London is expected to play a central role in restoring regular rail freight services through the Channel Tunnel.

The site is being positioned as an international logistics hub, supporting intermodal trains that can move containers seamlessly between rail, road and sea. This would enable more direct connections between the UK and key European markets including France, Germany, Italy and Spain.

Currently, only a limited volume of rail freight passes through the Channel Tunnel, with most UK–EU cargo continuing to rely on short sea crossings and onward road transport. 

The planned expansion of intermodal rail services is intended to rebalance that model and provide greater flexibility for cross-border supply chains.

Rail offers an alternative to congested road and port networks

The renewed focus on rail comes at a time when road and port infrastructure across the UK and Europe is under increasing pressure.

Shifting a greater share of freight onto rail has the potential to reduce congestion on key corridors in the south-east of England, while also improving transit predictability for certain flows. For shippers, this introduces an additional routing option that sits between road and sea in terms of both speed and cost.

Rail freight volumes have already been growing steadily, with increases of around 5% year on year and further gains in intermodal traffic. Forecasts suggest continued growth over the coming decade, supported by both infrastructure investment and policy commitments to expand rail’s role in the supply chain.

Unlocking new options for UK–Europe trade

The return of regular cross-Channel rail services could create new opportunities for both imports and exports.

For UK businesses, this includes more direct access to European markets for a wide range of goods, as well as improved inbound flows of time-sensitive products such as food and consumer goods. Intermodal rail also offers a more structured and predictable alternative for moving containerised cargo across borders.

However, realising this potential will depend on how effectively rail services are integrated into wider logistics networks. Efficient onward connections, competitive pricing and reliable scheduling will all be critical to making rail a commercially viable option at scale.

Rail is unlikely to replace road or sea, but it can play a valuable role as part of a broader intermodal strategy, particularly for flows that benefit from a balance of speed, cost and sustainability.

This is where coordination becomes critical. Moving containers efficiently between ports, rail terminals and final delivery points requires a joined-up approach across multiple modes and geographies.

Metro has extensive experience in pan-European intermodal transport, combining road, sea and rail solutions, alongside regular UK rail services connecting primary ports with inland destinations.

If you are looking to explore how cross-Channel rail could support your European flows, or how to integrate rail into your wider transport strategy, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director at Metro, for a practical discussion tailored to your network.