Bank of England

Policy Shifts and Market Volatility

Jun 9, 2025 | , ,

As the freight and logistics sector navigates a complex global landscape, the coming week marks a period of significant policy recalibration.

From fiscal reforms in the UK and US to central bank updates and ongoing geopolitical tensions, the external environment is shifting and with it, the operational and strategic considerations for logistics providers worldwide.

UK Spending Review 2025: A Reset for Public Investment and Infrastructure
The UK’s 2025 Spending Review, delivered by Chancellor Rachel Reeves on 11 June, represents a pivotal moment in the government’s fiscal strategy. It is the first multi-year review since 2021 and is being conducted under a “zero-based budgeting” approach, meaning all departmental budgets are being rebuilt from the ground up, rather than adjusted incrementally.

For the freight and logistics industry, the review carries several key implications:

  • Infrastructure Investment: The government has committed to a 10-year infrastructure strategy, with capital spending plans extending to 2029–30. An additional £113 billion is earmarked for capital infrastructure over the next five years. Logistics operators should closely monitor how this funding is allocated, particularly for road, rail, and port projects, which are critical to freight efficiency and network resilience.
  • Skills and Labour: A new construction skills package aims to train up to 60,000 additional workers, addressing chronic labour shortages in logistics-adjacent sectors. This may ease pressure on warehousing and construction timelines while supporting the development of new logistics hubs.
  • Public Procurement and Regional Development: The review is expected to shape procurement strategies and regional investment priorities. With a renewed focus on productivity and value for money, logistics firms engaged in public contracts or operating in economically underdeveloped regions, may see new opportunities or face tighter scrutiny.
  • Sustainability and Net Zero: While full details are pending, the review is likely to align with the UK’s broader decarbonisation goals. This may include funding for green transport initiatives, clean energy infrastructure, and incentives for low-emission freight solutions.

The Spending Review also comes amid a challenging economic context, shaped by inflation, global trade disruptions, and rising borrowing costs. Freight operators should prepare for a policy environment focused on efficiency, resilience, and long-term value creation.

Compounding these challenges, UK exports fell sharply in April, with a £2 billion decline in goods exports—driven primarily by new US import tariffs. This marked the largest monthly drop on record in exports to the United States and affected most categories of goods. Manufacturing output also fell, notably in the automotive and pharmaceutical sectors, as businesses scaled back production in anticipation of higher tariffs. After months of strong performance, export activity was further disrupted by firms pulling forward shipments earlier in the year to avoid newly imposed US levies.

US Tax Reform: A New Era for Trade and Investment?
In the United States, President Trump’s proposed “big, beautiful” tax bill is advancing through Congress. The legislation includes sweeping corporate tax cuts and incentives for domestic manufacturing, which could accelerate re-shoring trends and alter trade patterns. For logistics providers, this may result in:

  • Increased Domestic Freight Demand: As US-based production expands, demand for domestic transport, warehousing, and last-mile services is expected to rise.
  • Cross-Border Complexity: Changes to trade incentives and tariffs may shift the flow of goods between the US, Mexico, and Canada, requiring agile route planning and customs expertise.
  • Capital Investment Shifts: New tax incentives may drive clients to invest in automation, fleet upgrades, or new distribution centres—creating knock-on effects across the logistics value chain.

The new tariff regime is also contributing to global trade volatility. In the UK, the economic impact of the US tariffs is already being felt, with export volumes contracting and trade-dependent sectors seeing reduced investment activity. This highlights the need for logistics providers to stay alert to evolving bilateral trade risks and respond with adaptive planning.

Central Bank Updates: Currency and Credit Market Impacts
Both the Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve have held key monetary policy meetings. The Fed is expected to update its economic outlook, while the BoE continues balancing inflation control with economic stability. The implications for logistics include:

  • Currency Volatility: Exchange rate movements can affect international freight pricing, fuel costs, and contract margins.
  • Interest Rate Sensitivity: Higher borrowing costs may influence fleet financing, infrastructure investment, and client demand—particularly in capital-intensive sectors such as construction and manufacturing.

As ever, the geopolitical landscape offers little certainty for confident decision-making. In this climate, Metro can help drive your business forward by:

  • Diversifying supplier and route networks to reduce exposure to geopolitical and trade risks
  • Enhancing supply chain resilience and responsiveness through our advanced MVT platform

EMAIL Laurence Burford, Chief Financial Officer, today to explore how Metro can support your business through ongoing global disruption.

Istanbul

Near-Shoring Gains Momentum Across EMEA

Jun 5, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , ,

Faced with rising tariffs, geopolitical risk, and ongoing disruption to global transport networks, a growing number of businesses are turning to near-shoring as a strategic way to strengthen supply chains.

Near-shoring, the relocation of manufacturing or sourcing to nearby countries, gained attention in boardrooms when the pandemic exposed the vulnerabilities of far-flung, overly concentrated supply chains, with the current tariff disruption renewing interest in the strategy.

Recent data reveals a clear trend: foreign direct investment (FDI) into near-shore manufacturing hubs in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and North Africa is up more than 60% compared with pre-pandemic levels. More than 15 destinations across these regions recorded five or more manufacturing investment projects each over the past year.

Companies are seeking to reduce exposure to tariff shocks, avoid over-reliance on a single geography or supplier, and better respond to market shifts. Unlike full re-shoring, near-shoring offers a balanced approach, retaining cost efficiency while improving agility.

Major global manufacturers are already making moves. A well-known French automotive brand invested €400m to expand its Turkish operations into an EU export hub, while Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer BYD is building its first European plant in Hungary. Hungary alone has seen a 140% rise in manufacturing investment over five years, with Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and North Macedonia also recording strong gains.

In North Africa, Morocco and Egypt are emerging as strategic alternatives. These markets combine population scale, cost competitiveness, and a growing skilled workforce, making them attractive to firms seeking stable, scalable supply options within reach of European customers.

Supply chain, cost, and environmental advantages
Beyond geopolitical resilience, near-shoring offers a wide range of operational and environmental benefits:

  • Shorter lead times: Reduced transit distances enable faster response to demand changes and shorter replenishment cycles.
  • Lower transport costs: Closer-to-home sourcing significantly reduces shipping spend and exposure to ocean freight volatility.
  • Less reliance on air freight: Shorter routes and predictable lead times reduce the need for costly, carbon-intensive air freight.
  • Lower emissions: A more regionalised supply chain helps reduce carbon footprints and supports ESG and net-zero targets.
  • Improved collaboration: Proximity improves communication, supplier relationships, and coordination across the supply chain.
  • Risk mitigation: Near-shoring builds resilience into operations, limiting the impact of global disruptions.

While near-shoring may not match Asia’s ultra-low production costs, countries such as Turkey, Hungary, Egypt, and Morocco offer a strong balance of affordability, labour availability, and growing infrastructure.

Long-term advantage through strategic sourcing
Near-shoring is no longer a short-term reaction to tariffs or global disruption, it’s becoming a foundational pillar of modern supply chain strategy. Brands that invest in supplier networks closer to their markets are gaining long-term advantage through speed, adaptability, sustainability, and reduced risk.

Power your near-shore strategy with Metro
Whether you’re exploring new EMEA sourcing options or already shifting production closer to home, Metro has the tools and expertise to optimise your near-shore operations.

  • Our MVT supply chain platform delivers vendor management and end-to-end visibility
  • Our dedicated EMEA and Overland department provides regional expertise and support
  • Our regular European road services, including market-leading Turkish services, ensure seamless overland freight and final-mile delivery

EMAIL managing director, Andrew Smith, today to streamline your near-shoring strategy and secure a more sustainable, resilient supply chain.

Trumps tariffs 1440x1080 1

Court Ruling Challenges Trump’s Trade Strategy Amid Global Uncertainty

May 29, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A U.S. federal court has ruled that President Donald Trump’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs are illegal — delivering what may prove to be a major blow to his trade policy agenda, or simply a temporary setback.

On May 28, 2025, the United States Court of International Trade determined that President Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by imposing broad tariffs on imports from numerous countries. The court found that the administration’s justification did not meet the IEEPA’s requirement of an “unusual and extraordinary threat,” rendering the tariffs an improper use of executive power.

The three-judge panel unanimously held that the IEEPA does not authorise the president to unilaterally impose such sweeping tariffs, stressing the need for a clear mandate from Congress when it comes to major economic decisions. As a result, the court issued a permanent injunction against the tariffs and ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to stop collecting them.

The ruling requires that the tariffs be halted within 10 days. The Trump administration has announced plans to appeal, which could take the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Implications for Trade Policy
This decision directly challenges a key pillar of Trump’s trade strategy, which has leaned heavily on tariffs to address trade imbalances and shield U.S. industries. It may also influence ongoing negotiations with key partners such as the European Union and the United Kingdom by casting doubt on the legal basis for unilateral U.S. tariff actions.

While the court invalidated the sweeping global tariffs introduced on April 2 — including the baseline 10% levy and “reciprocal” duties — it did not strike down the administration’s sector-specific tariffs on imports like steel and cars, which remain in force.

The ruling is expected to embolden critics of Trump’s tariff policy across corporate America, foreign capitals, and Capitol Hill. It also comes at a sensitive moment for the administration, which is working to finalise new trade deals after suspending many of the planned tariff hikes.

The legal setback introduces fresh uncertainty into an already volatile global trade landscape — and may ultimately reshape how domestic and international actors engage with U.S. trade policy in the months ahead.

Stay informed as the US tariff and trade landscape evolves. Go to our home page to subscribe to our eBulletin updates for expert insight on the rulings, appeals, and what it all means for your supply chain strategy.

Parliament blur

UK Strikes Trio of Trade Deals in May

May 28, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The UK government has made major strides in strengthening its international trade relationships this May, concluding three key agreements with India (6 May), the United States (8 May), and the European Union (19 May).

These agreements could reshape trade routes and sourcing decisions, reduce costs, and create new opportunities for exporters and importers alike. With further negotiations under way with Gulf nations, the UK is expanding its global footprint.

UK-EU Agreement Reduces Border Friction
The updated UK-EU agreement, the first substantial step forward in post-Brexit cooperation, sets out revised terms for trade, fishing rights and defence collaboration. Of particular note is the reduction in bureaucracy around food shipments, with most routine checks on animal and plant products travelling between the UK and EU scrapped.

This could significantly ease the administrative burden and reduce delays for companies dealing in perishable goods. However, details on how the agreement affects the movement of non-food goods, including machinery, textiles and other industrial or consumer products, remain to be clarified.

While the deal does not represent a return to the frictionless trade of the pre-Brexit era, it is an encouraging signal that practical cooperation is possible. For businesses that rely on predictable cross-border movements, this agreement may help restore a degree of confidence.

US Agreement Offers Narrow, Targeted Relief
Despite being framed as a “trade deal”, the UK-US agreement is a limited, sector-specific tariff arrangement rather than a full-scale free trade agreement. That said, it delivers tangible relief in several key areas.

For UK exporters of vehicles, the US has cut its tariff from 25% to 10%, but only for up to 100,000 vehicles annually. This mirrors the volume of UK exports in 2024, but it places a hard ceiling on further growth, with exports above that threshold subject to a 27.5% tariff.

The removal of 25% tariffs on UK steel and aluminium also brings welcome relief to manufacturers. However, these benefits come with conditions, including expected quotas and continued duties on certain products made with these metals, such as gym equipment and industrial machinery.

While the UK has dropped some tariffs on US food and agricultural products, reciprocal benefits for UK exporters beyond the automotive and metal sectors remain limited. A blanket 10% US tariff still applies to most other UK goods, and a 25% tariff on UK automotive parts remains in place. Details on additional product categories, including consumer goods and manufactured components, are expected in due course.

The deal is a step forward, but it leaves a patchwork of tariffs and quotas that will require careful navigation. Legal and regulatory uncertainties will persist in the months ahead as negotiations continue and further details emerge.

India Deal Signals Long-Term Growth Potential
The UK’s agreement with India stands out as the most comprehensive and forward-looking of the three deals. It includes significant tariff reductions and market access improvements across a wide range of products, and is forecast to increase bilateral trade by £25.5 billion annually by 2040.

UK exports set to benefit include whisky, gin, aerospace components, medical devices, cosmetics, and high-end vehicles. In return, the UK will lower tariffs on Indian exports such as clothing, footwear, frozen foodstuffs, jewellery, and processed goods.

For importers, the deal offers more competitive access to one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. For exporters, it opens the door to India’s expanding middle class, which is already larger than the entire population of the EU and is hungry for high-quality, internationally branded products.

Beyond tariffs, the agreement promises to streamline customs procedures and reduce non-tariff barriers, improvements that will be welcomed by any business frustrated by red tape or unpredictable clearance processes. However, the full legal text is yet to be published, and the final impact will depend on detailed implementation rules, particularly around rules of origin and product classifications.

Looking at Gulf Nations Opportunities
Speaking to the BBC on 20 May, Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed that the UK’s next strategic focus is on securing trade agreements with countries in the Gulf, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar. Ongoing discussions aim to boost UK exports of food and drink, renewable energy technologies, and manufactured goods, while encouraging more inward investment.

Reeves also clarified that the government is “not looking to have trade negotiations” with China, which draws a line under speculation about future UK-China trade relations for the foreseeable future.

Implications for UK Businesses
For UK businesses, whether they import raw materials or finished goods, or export to overseas markets, these deals bring both opportunity and complexity. While tariff reductions and customs streamlining can offer immediate cost savings and efficiency gains, the sector-specific and quota-based nature of the agreements means that success will depend on careful planning and informed decision-making.

The three deals signal a broader shift in the UK’s trade strategy, one that favours targeted, bilateral agreements over sweeping free trade pacts. They also reflect a pragmatic effort to strengthen links with fast-growing economies and key strategic allies.

As implementation details unfold and further negotiations continue, UK businesses will need to stay agile, review their supply chains, and consider how to best take advantage of the new landscape.

Metro’s established freight services, in-house customs brokerage, and on-the-ground teams in both India and the United States mean we’re uniquely placed to help UK businesses respond to this new trade landscape.

Whether you’re reviewing sourcing strategies, navigating new tariffs, or planning market entry, our experts can support you with compliant, cost-effective solutions across every mode and market.

EMAIL Managing Director, Andrew Smith to explore how we can optimise your global trade strategy.

Category: Economics

4PL | Automotive | Chemical | China | Customs | eCommerce | Economics | EU | Exports | Foodstuffs | Hong Kong | India | International Trade | News | Project | Publishing | Retail | Supply Chain | United States

Latest News in this category