Court Ruling Challenges Trump’s Trade Strategy Amid Global Uncertainty

Court Ruling Challenges Trump’s Trade Strategy Amid Global Uncertainty

A U.S. federal court has ruled that President Donald Trump’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs are illegal — delivering what may prove to be a major blow to his trade policy agenda, or simply a temporary setback.

On May 28, 2025, the United States Court of International Trade determined that President Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by imposing broad tariffs on imports from numerous countries. The court found that the administration’s justification did not meet the IEEPA’s requirement of an “unusual and extraordinary threat,” rendering the tariffs an improper use of executive power.

The three-judge panel unanimously held that the IEEPA does not authorise the president to unilaterally impose such sweeping tariffs, stressing the need for a clear mandate from Congress when it comes to major economic decisions. As a result, the court issued a permanent injunction against the tariffs and ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to stop collecting them.

The ruling requires that the tariffs be halted within 10 days. The Trump administration has announced plans to appeal, which could take the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Implications for Trade Policy
This decision directly challenges a key pillar of Trump’s trade strategy, which has leaned heavily on tariffs to address trade imbalances and shield U.S. industries. It may also influence ongoing negotiations with key partners such as the European Union and the United Kingdom by casting doubt on the legal basis for unilateral U.S. tariff actions.

While the court invalidated the sweeping global tariffs introduced on April 2 — including the baseline 10% levy and “reciprocal” duties — it did not strike down the administration’s sector-specific tariffs on imports like steel and cars, which remain in force.

The ruling is expected to embolden critics of Trump’s tariff policy across corporate America, foreign capitals, and Capitol Hill. It also comes at a sensitive moment for the administration, which is working to finalise new trade deals after suspending many of the planned tariff hikes.

The legal setback introduces fresh uncertainty into an already volatile global trade landscape — and may ultimately reshape how domestic and international actors engage with U.S. trade policy in the months ahead.

Stay informed as the US tariff and trade landscape evolves. Go to our home page to subscribe to our eBulletin updates for expert insight on the rulings, appeals, and what it all means for your supply chain strategy.

UK Strikes Trio of Trade Deals in May

UK Strikes Trio of Trade Deals in May

The UK government has made major strides in strengthening its international trade relationships this May, concluding three key agreements with India (6 May), the United States (8 May), and the European Union (19 May).

These agreements could reshape trade routes and sourcing decisions, reduce costs, and create new opportunities for exporters and importers alike. With further negotiations under way with Gulf nations, the UK is expanding its global footprint.

UK-EU Agreement Reduces Border Friction
The updated UK-EU agreement, the first substantial step forward in post-Brexit cooperation, sets out revised terms for trade, fishing rights and defence collaboration. Of particular note is the reduction in bureaucracy around food shipments, with most routine checks on animal and plant products travelling between the UK and EU scrapped.

This could significantly ease the administrative burden and reduce delays for companies dealing in perishable goods. However, details on how the agreement affects the movement of non-food goods, including machinery, textiles and other industrial or consumer products, remain to be clarified.

While the deal does not represent a return to the frictionless trade of the pre-Brexit era, it is an encouraging signal that practical cooperation is possible. For businesses that rely on predictable cross-border movements, this agreement may help restore a degree of confidence.

US Agreement Offers Narrow, Targeted Relief
Despite being framed as a “trade deal”, the UK-US agreement is a limited, sector-specific tariff arrangement rather than a full-scale free trade agreement. That said, it delivers tangible relief in several key areas.

For UK exporters of vehicles, the US has cut its tariff from 25% to 10%, but only for up to 100,000 vehicles annually. This mirrors the volume of UK exports in 2024, but it places a hard ceiling on further growth, with exports above that threshold subject to a 27.5% tariff.

The removal of 25% tariffs on UK steel and aluminium also brings welcome relief to manufacturers. However, these benefits come with conditions, including expected quotas and continued duties on certain products made with these metals, such as gym equipment and industrial machinery.

While the UK has dropped some tariffs on US food and agricultural products, reciprocal benefits for UK exporters beyond the automotive and metal sectors remain limited. A blanket 10% US tariff still applies to most other UK goods, and a 25% tariff on UK automotive parts remains in place. Details on additional product categories, including consumer goods and manufactured components, are expected in due course.

The deal is a step forward, but it leaves a patchwork of tariffs and quotas that will require careful navigation. Legal and regulatory uncertainties will persist in the months ahead as negotiations continue and further details emerge.

India Deal Signals Long-Term Growth Potential
The UK’s agreement with India stands out as the most comprehensive and forward-looking of the three deals. It includes significant tariff reductions and market access improvements across a wide range of products, and is forecast to increase bilateral trade by £25.5 billion annually by 2040.

UK exports set to benefit include whisky, gin, aerospace components, medical devices, cosmetics, and high-end vehicles. In return, the UK will lower tariffs on Indian exports such as clothing, footwear, frozen foodstuffs, jewellery, and processed goods.

For importers, the deal offers more competitive access to one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. For exporters, it opens the door to India’s expanding middle class, which is already larger than the entire population of the EU and is hungry for high-quality, internationally branded products.

Beyond tariffs, the agreement promises to streamline customs procedures and reduce non-tariff barriers, improvements that will be welcomed by any business frustrated by red tape or unpredictable clearance processes. However, the full legal text is yet to be published, and the final impact will depend on detailed implementation rules, particularly around rules of origin and product classifications.

Looking at Gulf Nations Opportunities
Speaking to the BBC on 20 May, Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed that the UK’s next strategic focus is on securing trade agreements with countries in the Gulf, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar. Ongoing discussions aim to boost UK exports of food and drink, renewable energy technologies, and manufactured goods, while encouraging more inward investment.

Reeves also clarified that the government is “not looking to have trade negotiations” with China, which draws a line under speculation about future UK-China trade relations for the foreseeable future.

Implications for UK Businesses
For UK businesses, whether they import raw materials or finished goods, or export to overseas markets, these deals bring both opportunity and complexity. While tariff reductions and customs streamlining can offer immediate cost savings and efficiency gains, the sector-specific and quota-based nature of the agreements means that success will depend on careful planning and informed decision-making.

The three deals signal a broader shift in the UK’s trade strategy, one that favours targeted, bilateral agreements over sweeping free trade pacts. They also reflect a pragmatic effort to strengthen links with fast-growing economies and key strategic allies.

As implementation details unfold and further negotiations continue, UK businesses will need to stay agile, review their supply chains, and consider how to best take advantage of the new landscape.

Metro’s established freight services, in-house customs brokerage, and on-the-ground teams in both India and the United States mean we’re uniquely placed to help UK businesses respond to this new trade landscape.

Whether you’re reviewing sourcing strategies, navigating new tariffs, or planning market entry, our experts can support you with compliant, cost-effective solutions across every mode and market.

EMAIL Managing Director, Andrew Smith to explore how we can optimise your global trade strategy.

Tariffs, Complexity and Opportunity

Tariffs, Complexity and Opportunity

As the United States recalibrates its tariff landscape, importers (and DDP exporters) are navigating a rapidly shifting environment. With Section 301 tariffs on Chinese goods still firmly in place, it has never been more critical to understand which tariffs apply and how to calculate them.

In mid-May 2025, the US and China agreed to a temporary 90-day pause, reducing some of the steepest retaliatory tariffs introduced earlier this year. As a result the “Liberation Day” tariffs of 145% were reduced to 30% for a limited set of goods.

However, the vast majority of Section 301 tariffs of >20%, imposed since the original US-China trade war in 2018, remain fully in effect. These apply to thousands of products, from electronics and machinery to apparel, plastics, and consumer goods.

Even with the temporary relief, many Chinese imports still face aggregate duty rates between 25% and 45%, and in some categories even higher, depending on classification.

Meanwhile, other major trading blocs continue to face pressure:

  • United Kingdom: 10% for automotives, capped at 100,000 vehicles annually 10% blanket tariff for most other goods including consumer goods, machinery, and textiles
  • Canada & Mexico: A 25% duty now applies to most goods, with energy imports from Canada also hit by an additional 10% levy.
  • European Union: Proposed 50% tariffs have been postponed until 9 July, but the delay only adds to uncertainty.
  • Rest of World: Many categories of industrial and consumer goods continue to carry elevated Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) rates, while countries without a preferential trade agreement with the US face duties ranging from 5% to 25%, depending on classification.

This fragmented tariff regime has introduced significant compliance risk, particularly for shippers working across multiple geographies.

Compliance is Complex—and Getting it Wrong is Costly
With tariffs now applied differently by origin, product type, and trade agreement status, accuracy in classification and valuation is critical. Errors can lead to underpayment (and penalties), overpayment (and lost margin), or shipment delays.

Key areas of risk include:

  • HS Codes (Harmonised System codes): A single digit variation can shift a product from a 5% duty rate to 25%. For example, a screw compressor may fall under HS code 8414.80.16 (duty-free) or 8414.80.90 (5.0%).
  • Country of Origin Rules: Manufacturing in multiple countries complicates origin determination. A shirt assembled in Vietnam from Chinese fabric may not qualify for any duty relief under existing agreements.
  • Valuation: Freight, insurance and packaging must be properly declared when calculating the dutiable value. Missteps here lead to unexpected cost and audit risk.

For exporters selling DDP, the challenge is even greater: you’re liable for these duties, meaning you absorb the cost of any errors. In today’s environment, even small misclassifications can compound across shipments, eroding profitability.

Turning Tariffs into Opportunity
While challenging, this tariff environment also presents strategic opportunities for those who are prepared:

  • Supply Chain Diversification: Shifting sourcing to countries with lower US duty rates can generate meaningful savings. Even partial shifts can de-risk exposure.
  • Tariff Engineering: By adjusting product configuration or final assembly location, shippers can legally change a product’s classification or origin. For instance, repackaging or minor reassembly in a third country may reduce duty rates.
  • Bonded Warehousing & FTZs: Storing goods in US Foreign Trade Zones or bonded facilities can defer, reduce, or eliminate duty payments, especially when re-exporting or assembling in the US before domestic release.

Amid rising costs and intense global competition, such strategies can help turn tariff exposure into a competitive advantage.

We combine trade compliance expertise, global freight execution, and strategic planning to help you manage tariff risk and unlock supply chain opportunities.

  • Expert customs brokerage teams based in the US
  • Product classification and duty calculations
  • Duty mitigation strategies, including bonded warehousing
  • Trade lane analysis and landed cost modelling
  • Supply chain rerouting and logistics reconfiguration

EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director, to learn how Metro help you stay compliant, minimise supply chain risk, and unlock opportunities.

IMEC: Europe’s New Trade Bridge to India

IMEC: Europe’s New Trade Bridge to India

Launched as a strategic counterweight to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) is poised to reshape global trade flows between Europe, India, and beyond.

Backed by a coalition of world powers including the US, EU, India, and key Middle Eastern nations, IMEC promises to link South Asia with Europe through a multimodal network of ports, railways, and digital and energy infrastructure.

Announced during the G20 summit in New Delhi in 2023, the corridor will connect India’s western coast to Europe via the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Israel. From India’s planned Vadhavan deepwater port, ships would cross the Arabian Sea to Jebel Ali in the UAE, with cargo then moving by rail across the Arabian Peninsula to Israel’s port of Haifa. A final sea leg would take goods from the Mediterranean into European markets.

The corridor is designed to shorten transit times between India and Europe by up to 40%, with a summit of IMEC partners planned before the end of 2025 to present concrete initiatives.

With an estimated cost of $600 billion, IMEC also includes undersea data cables and pipelines for green hydrogen, making it as much an energy and digital connectivity play as a trade route.

Initial implementation has focused on India’s western coast, where the Modi government has greenlit the construction of the Vadhavan port. This $9 billion project is designed to handle mega-vessels and includes dedicated terminals for petroleum and automobile imports. Operational capacity is expected to reach nearly 300 million metric tons per year, with phased completion set for 2029.

From Europe’s perspective, IMEC opens up long-term opportunities to diversify supply chains, reduce reliance on volatile routes like the Suez Canal, and deepen strategic engagement with India. Transiting via Haifa not only provides a direct connection into the Mediterranean, but also serves as a hedge against disruptions in the Red Sea, including threats posed by Houthi rebel activity.

However, IMEC’s path is not without hurdles. Political instability in the region threaten the corridor’s viability and experts argue that normalised Saudi-Israeli relations would be key to securing the route, especially to ensure infrastructure security and cross-border cooperation.

India sees IMEC as central to its export-led growth model. Trade flows between India and Europe are forecast to grow by 6% annually through 2032, but current infrastructure cannot handle the expected increase. By offering a more direct and integrated pathway, IMEC positions India as a vital hub in global supply chains.

While financing remains a key challenge, particularly for European stakeholders juggling defence, energy, and industrial spending, IMEC’s geopolitical weight initially secured rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Although the project was launched during Joe Biden’s presidency, with strong US endorsement, the stance of the current administration toward international infrastructure projects remains less defined. Its evolving approach to global trade may not prioritise IMEC with the same intensity.

Images used under CC BY-SA 4.0
IMEC map
GODL-India

With India’s manufacturing capacity expanding and the IMEC corridor set to transform east–west trade, now is the time to re-evaluate your logistics strategy.

Metro is already investing in India’s future, helping global brands tap into a faster, more resilient, and sustainable trade route to Europe.

EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director, to explore how our on-the-ground expertise in India can future-proof your supply chain.